Physical AI is useful as a way to examine how learned intelligence connects to physical action. This guide separates the model, robot, operating environment and evidence needed to judge an actual system.
Identity boundary. Original PhysicalAI.best editorial guide. Source links support factual examples; evaluation questions and decision rules are editorial guidance, not upstream endorsements.
Start with a physical decision
For this database, physical AI describes learned perception, reasoning or action used in a system that interacts with the physical world. This is a working editorial scope, not a certification. Google DeepMind’s Gemini Robotics family illustrates the action-model layer, while a deployed robot also needs hardware, control and an operating environment. The useful question is which decisions the learned system makes and which other components constrain it.
Boston Dynamics · Publication date not disclosed · Source accessed 2026-09-28
Official page read during live research; confirms identity and listed offering. Performance language remains a company claim.
Separate the objects being evaluated
A company, model and robot are different objects. A developer may publish a model without selling a robot, while a robot supplier may combine several software components. Begin a shortlist with the exact system and version that could perform the intended task. Then trace its developer, software, training or evaluation evidence and commercial access. Brand familiarity cannot fill a missing link in that chain.
Boston Dynamics · Publication date not disclosed · Source accessed 2026-09-28
Official page read during live research; confirms identity and listed offering. Performance language remains a company claim.
Describe one complete task
Write the task as a beginning, action and observable end: for example, moving a tote from one station to another under stated conditions. Record object variation, people nearby, workspace changes and recovery requirements. GXO’s Digit announcement is useful because it describes a concrete logistics context. It is evidence about that operation, rather than a claim that the same robot can perform every warehouse job.
GXO · Published 2024-06-27 · Source accessed 2026-09-28
Customer describes commercial live-warehouse operation after a pilot. Does not identify current Digit 5 hardware.
Keep research, demonstration and operation separate
A simulation score, edited demonstration and customer-operated workflow answer different questions. LIBERO evaluates specified simulated manipulation tasks; a deployment source concerns an installation and workflow. Neither should erase the other’s limits. Look for evidence closest to the decision being made, and keep unanswered fields visible. A missing intervention rate is an unanswered operating question, not evidence that intervention never occurs.
GXO · Published 2024-06-27 · Source accessed 2026-09-28
Customer describes commercial live-warehouse operation after a pilot. Does not identify current Digit 5 hardware.
Use the graph to decide what to investigate
Follow a company to its product, model, evaluation and deployment records. A broken evidentiary link is a research question: which model revision is installed, what task was tested, or who confirms operation? For an initial assessment, identify the proposed task, required human support, acceptance test and buyer access path. These details make the term physical AI useful beyond a broad market label.
Related reading is an editorial crosslink. Sourced connections describe relationships reported in the cited material. A link to a versioned profile does not establish compatibility with that version unless the connection note explicitly identifies it.
Record history & verified changes
A research review records when we checked a source. It does not mark a product launch or a new deployment.
Initial reviewed record. No subsequent field change has been recorded.